Brief
You describe the users, the job to be done, current tools and any hard date or constraint. A page is enough.
Services
QA that protects the release, not a ceremony at the end
Hirvex Technologies tests the software we build, and we can add structured QA to a product you already run. The point is release confidence: known paths, known devices, and defects described well enough to fix. We do not sell fake automation coverage or overnight “certification”.
Who this is for. Product owners who need a second set of eyes before customers see a change, or who want QA built into an ongoing Hirvex delivery.
Problems we typically meet
These are the patterns that show up before a useful first release—not abstract “digital transformation” language.
- Testers are given the build on the afternoon of launch.
- Bugs are reported as screenshots with no steps or environment.
- Regression is tribal knowledge in one person’s head.
- Automation exists but nobody trusts it, so people still click everything.
How we approach the work
We write a test plan from the real user jobs and the risks (payments, permissions, data loss). Manual sessions cover exploratory and new UI. Automated checks cover stable, high-value paths when they earn their keep. Reports name severity, environment and how to reproduce.
What a serious first release can include
Scope is confirmed in discovery. This is the shape of work we are equipped to deliver—not a menu you must buy in full.
- Test plans tied to release scope
- Functional and regression testing
- Cross-browser and mobile device passes for the agreed matrix
- API checks for integrations we own
- Defect writing developers can act on
- Release go/no-go notes
What we need from you
A useful brief is better than a long one. If you can answer most of the following, we can propose a first slice instead of a theatre estimate.
- Who will use this, and what must they finish in a session?
- Which systems must stay (accounting, payments, identity, a shop)?
- What is already live that we should not break?
- Any hosting region, language or compliance rule that is non-negotiable?
- The date that actually matters—and why.
How an engagement runs
Four steps. No mystery bench.
Scope
We reply with clarifying questions and a first-release outline: modules, roles, integrations and what “done” means.
Build
Named engineers work in visible increments, with staging you can click and a weekly written status.
Run
Launch, handover and a support path. The system is yours to operate—not a black box we disappear from.
Questions we are asked
Do you offer a testing-only team for any product?
We primarily QA systems we understand. Independent QA for a third-party codebase is possible after a paid familiarisation period.
Will you automate everything?
No. We automate where the path is stable and the cost of a miss is high. Unstable UI is still cheaper to test by a person.
Can you test security?
We test for common application mistakes in the course of delivery. A dedicated penetration test should come from a specialist firm; we will not impersonate one.
Start a conversation
If this is the work in front of you
Send the users, the job to be done and any hard constraint. We will answer as engineers—not with a canned brochure.